UW owed an apology

I have never been particularly impressed with the newspaper Imprint and after reading Dan's article "The lunacy of prejudice" it isn't hard to find out why. Just who the hell does this guy think he is?

For those of you who didn't read the article, it was promoting homosexual rights and talked of ending discrimination against gays. The article, which was poorly written and weak in content, went on to compare mainstream heterosexuals with Nazi Germany. Needless to say the article was biased propaganda that doesn't belong on campus. Besides, anyone with a little common sense knows just how dangerous homosexuality really is. I'm referring to AIDS of course, and everyone knows gays and lesbians are the primary carriers of this disease. In addition, gays have a very high suicide rate which further shows their mental instability. Now I don't want to sound mean or anything, but I have to call it like it is. Believe it or not, I usually put up with homosexuals without saying a thing. Quite frankly, I tolerate it very well. However, I refuse to have your newspaper mislead people into believing that a homosexual lifestyle is a healthy one. What exactly is Dan thinking when he wrote this article? Unfortunately, I am force to speculate that Dan is himself a homosexual, and if this is the case Imprint owes it to the students of UW to have specified that fact. Maybe then we can understand his faulty logic. Nonetheless, I never figured that Imprint would lower itself to publish this kind of garbage. Perhaps the newspaper would be better suited for Ryerson University where it would have the support of that homosexual professor Gerald Hannan. As a student here at the University of Waterloo I take pride in the ethical principles and moral integrity of the school. Dan's article inappropriately conflicts with the values of the University of Waterloo, and, therefore, he owes all students an apology.

Back | Index | Forward

Send comments to: kovu at lionking point org